Sunday, November 30, 2008
Concerned about judgement(attachment issue).
The judgement of Taiwan doesn't have any jury, it sentence only by judge. That's unfair. A bill should be discussed by everybody whom is related to the case, and let them say what they had experienced and their true feeling. Abundant bills may be punished wrong person because no jury, other witnesses to offer their opinion, or judge had been bribed. Usually if the case is big, judge would be bribed in Taiwan. Very little cops caught illegal things, chances are that they are already bribed by mafia, or they just lazy and afraid of interfering in things to get trouble.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Hmmm interesting. But if a judge can be bribed, then it seems like a jury could be bribed too. It might be easier to watch a few judges than watch lots of juries.
Incidently, I think jury trials are great. I'm just not sure if they would solve the problem of rampant corruption.
Post a Comment